Join us on June 7 in NYC with special guests John Oliver and Olivia Wilde!

Physicians for Reproductive Health will be hosting a powerful and moving celebration of doctors who provide abortions.

Blog

SCOTUS rally picture

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country, Texas House Bill 2 (HB2). Now, new research from the Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) in the American Journal of Public Health shows that the forced closure of over half of abortion clinics in Texas has, as predicted, resulted in significant burdens for women — including increased travel distances, high out-of-pocket costs, overnight stays, and decreased access to medication abortion. For women in the study whose nearest abortion clinic closed after HB2, the average distance to the nearest provider increased fourfold.

According to author Liza Fuentes: “This study is unusual in its ability to assess multiple burdens imposed on women as a result of clinic closures, but it is important to note that the burdens documented here are not the only hardships that women experienced as a result of HB2.” Previous research by TxPEP has documented both increased wait times experienced by all women accessing abortion care in Texas after HB2 as well as cases of women who were not able to obtain abortion care due to clinic closures.

For copies of the full report, please click here

Hearing2Despite widespread public disagreement, anti-choice members of Congress continue to introduce legislation restricting access to abortion and doctors’ ability to provide patients with the highest level of care. On Tuesday, Physicians’ Jodi Magee testified at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington, DC, to express Physicians’ strong opposition to these abortion bans.

“Make no mistake; the legislation we’re discussing today represents another attempt to make it impossible for women to access abortion,” Magee said during her oral statement. “Because politicians know that the public and major medical groups do not support this position, they are disingenuously presenting these restrictions as only applying to very limited situations. But let’s be clear: this is part of a concerted effort to intrude on the personal health care decisions of women.”

Magee was joined by Dr. Diana Greene Foster, of the University of California-San Francisco and Ms. Christy Zink, a mother of two, in testifying against the bans at the hearing. The hearing was reported on widely by news outlets like Politico and MSNBC, and coverage highlighted the statements by pro-choice Senators who took to the floor Tuesday to decry the proposed bans as the latest step in a long line of attacks to “turn back the clock on women’s health care”.

You can watch Magee’s testimony on the Judiciary Committee’s website.