Topic
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, deeming it constitutional to ban transgender students from playing on school sports teams consistent with their gender identity.
PRH urges Congress to protect evidence-based gender-affirming care for trans youth, families, and providers.
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued their decision in Chiles v. Salazar with an 8-1 ruling with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as the sole dissenter. Their decision determined that conversion talk therapy is protected by the first ame...
PRH, Abortion Care Network, and National Abortion Federation submitted comments in opposition to two proposed regulations that target access to gender-affirming care for trans youth.
PRH and more than 50 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations are calling out two anti-transgender health care bills that mirror long-standing attacks on abortion access and bodily autonomy.
Healthcare providers dedicate our lives to the wellbeing of families and communities. We have deep concerns about policies that mandate separating newborns from their parents at birth.
In this article, PRH fellow Dr. Meera and PRH community members Megan and MaryBeth examine how punitive health care practices deepen harm and argue that abolitionist, harm-reduction care creates a future grounded in dignity and liberation.
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States is hearing oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar, a case that will determine whether or not states are allowed to protect young people from the harmful practices of conversion therapy.
It’s been a hot, hostile summer, and the Supreme Court only turned up the heat by attacking our rights and freedoms. As a new term begins, we know one thing for sure: the courts won’t save us, but our communities will.
Together, we can build a future where no one goes without the health care they need. Donate today.
